UMass Amherst Releases Greatest Gambling Learn In US History

A UMass study on video gaming attitudes and behaviors is said to be the largest in US history.

Gambling is an important topic in Massachusetts at the moment, as the state prepares for the coming of at least two big resort casinos next few years.

Prior to that gaming expansion, the University of Massachusetts at Amherst (UMass Amherst) has released a research that provides set up a baseline for their state of gambling in the state now, one that will then be used to trace changes in long term studies.

The analysis, which comes from the educational school of Public Health and Health Sciences at UMass Amherst, surveyed almost 10,000 Massachusetts residents.

That’s sufficient in order to make it the gambling study that is largest ever completed in the usa.

Survey Establishes Baseline for Future Studies

The study was praised by Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Steve Crosby, who stated it should provide a way that is objective understand how the state will be influenced by gambling going ahead.

‘The most crucial point is that we are establishing standard conditions for every socio and economic variable that would be impacted by the introduction of casinos,’ Crosby said. ‘Our researchers will then track changes in those variables on the lifetime of the casinos in order to know up to a certainty the consequences and also to inform data-driven mitigation strategies for just about any potential negative consequences.’

The study was conducted between September 2013 and May 2014, with state residents being selected at random to complete the questionnaire.

The outcome was a wide range of information detailing precisely how people in Massachusetts gamble and view different forms of gaming.

As an example, it turns out that about 72 per cent of respondents reported gambling at least onetime over the year that is past.

Many Massachusetts residents (about 60 per cent) stated they played the lottery, while 22 % reported that they’d gone to a casino during the year that is past.

Residents Like Casinos, However Locally

One hot topic in the region was how Massachusetts’ brand new casinos will impact current casino operations in Connecticut. The study suggests that officials in Connecticut are straight to be concerned: 65 percent of those Massachusetts residents who went to casinos visited resorts in Connecticut, a portion that should go way down once the Wynn Everett and MGM Springfield are operational.

The study also investigated just how residents feel about the state’s gambling expansion, which includes a slots parlor or more to three full-scale casinos. The answer was one that has been heard in many communities through the state: not in my own backyard.

A very good 59 % majority of adults in Massachusetts said which they think gambling expansion will either have neutral impact or be useful to the state.

But, 46 percent think that gambling expansion would be harmful inside their community that is own only 28 percent believe casino expansion would be useful locally.

The study also found that illegal gambling had been fairly common in Massachusetts. About 13 percent of residents had bet on sports in the previous year, while two percent reporting gambling on unregulated Web gaming web sites.

More in-depth analysis associated with the data collected is expected to be released within the months to come. However, major detective Rachel Volberg says that the real value in this study ended up being gathering information before viewpoints could be shaped by the introduction of casinos.

‘Not many people realize how unusual it’s for the problem gambling study to be completed before some new type of gambling becomes available,’ Volberg said. ‘The Commonwealth is fortunate that both the Expanded Gaming Act and the Massachusetts Gaming Commission so clearly and forcefully supported such an effort and I am excited to share our findings before any casinos begin operations in our state.’

Interpol Disbands €20 Million Anti-Match-Fixing Relationship With FIFA

FIFA President Sepp Blatter (right) after which Secretary General of Interpol, Ronald Noble, seal the deal. Interpol has now figured FIFA doesn’t share might values associated with police force community.’ No shit! (Image:

Interpol has frozen a €20 ($22.5 million) donation, paid to it by FIFA, to fund a joint anti-match-fixing program.

The 10-year Integrity in Sport initiative was designed to stamp out fixed games orchestrated by criminal wagering syndicates, but Interpol stated this week that the FIFA corruption scandal had made the relationship untenable.

‘In light of the context that is current FIFA, while Interpol continues to be committed to developing our Integrity in Sport program, i’ve determined to suspend the agreement,’ said Interpol Secretary General Jürgen Stock. ‘ All partners that are external whether public or private, must share the fundamental values and concepts of the company, too as those of the wider law enforcement community.’

The terms and conditions of the deal, signed in 2011, state that that FIFA must remain ‘compatible aided by the principles, aims and activities of Interpol,’ but, following arrest of seven FIFA officials while the result of a massive FBI corruption probe, Interpol may be forgiven for feeling that the soccer body that is governing not kept up its end of the bargain.

Why Now?

It begs the question, though, why had been Interpol, featuring its access that is wide-reaching to expansive network of police force agencies, unaware of FIFA corruption last year?

The British press was crying foul as far back as 2006. This was the year that journalist Andrew Jennings published Foul! The Key World of FIFA: Bribes, Vote-Rigging and Ticket Scandals. The name says it all.

Additionally in 2006, Panorama, a BBC present affairs program, broadcast a documentary asserting that Sepp Blatter had been investigated by Swiss police for attempting to wallpaper more than a FIFA bribery scandal.

The former chairman of the English Football Association, described FIFA as an organization that ‘behaves like a mafia family’ in it, Lord Triesman,

Swiss Humor

A follow-up Panorama documentary in 2010 accused Issa Hayatou, Vice President of FIFA, of taking bribes. He threatened to sue the BBC, but he did not.

Interpol’s willingness to bury its head in the sand might have been more in regards to the fact that the €20 million FIFA paid to the law that is international agency constituted more than one fourth of its yearly budget.

Finally, though, with FIFA exposed and indicted by the US, the nation that is only dared to contain the organization to task, it ended up being too much, or to embarrassing, for Interpol to stomach.

For a lighter note, the FIFA communications director Walter De Gregorio cracked a ‘joke’ about his employers on Swiss TV this week, and believe us, it’s a zinger!

‘ The FIFA president, secretary general and communications director are all traveling in a motor vehicle,’ grinned De Gregorio.

‘But who’s driving’ he quizzed.

‘The authorities,’ he zinged.

Shortly afterwards FIFA announced that De Gregorio had plumped for to ‘relinquish his office.’

Ritz Club Sues Tycoon Safa Abdulla Al Geabury Over £2 million Gambling Debt.

Safa Abdulla Al Geabury, whose £2 million dud check bounced when Ritz staff attempted to cash it the time after his gambling spree. (Image:

The Ritz Club, London’s famously high-end, high-roller casino, is suing a property that is swiss over a £2 million ($3.1 million) bounced check.

In accordance with the Ritz’s filing, Safa Abdulla Al Geabury composed out the check to finance a gambling session one night in February last year, but it turned into a dud whenever casino tried to bank it the morning that is following.

The Ritz can be searching for an additional £200,000 ($310,000) in accumulated interest on your debt.

It’s been reported that the casino, that will be owned by reclusive billionaire twins that are identical Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay, has been plunged into the red with a group of unpaid gambling debts, forcing it to pursue its debtors aggressively in the courts.

In line with the London Evening Standard, the casino has litigated against 10 high rollers in the year that is last in an effort to recoup 2013 losses of £12.5 million ($19.4 million).

Al-Daher Case

Al Geabury’s protection is which he is a gambling addict and his staff needs understood this and stopped him from playing.

He desires the debts written off, but he is on shaky ground with this line; in 2014 the casino won an identical High Court battle against Noora Al-Daher, the wife of the Omani minister that is foreign.

The Ritz sued Al-Daher after she had checked out the casino in April 2012 and proceeded to lose £2 million ($3.3 million) in a couple of hours. Al-Daher failed to honor £1 million ($1.65) of her financial obligation. She quickly counter-sued the casino, claiming that the casino had taken benefit of her.

Al-Daher had claimed in court that Ritz Club employees encouraged her to continue playing a game of chemin-de-fer, despite having been made aware of her gambling addiction, and also allowed her to cash checks, which she claimed was illegal.

She also said that the casino was under a ‘duty of care’ towards her, a responsibility which it had neglected to fulfill.

Psychiatric Reports

But, the court heard that Al-Daher and her family had apparently happily gambled away $5 million in Las Vegas a few months after her visit towards the Ritz.

In ruling in favor of the casino, the judge said he was certain that, had Al-Daher been refused authorization to carry in gambling at the Ritz, she ‘would happen eager and likely to gamble at other casinos thereafter, and extremely most likely during her stay in London through the times or weeks after 3 April 2012.’

The judge into the Al Geabury situation, Mrs Justice Simler, meanwhile, stated at a preliminary hearing that psychiatric reports happen commissioned to assess Al Geabury’s state of head in the day he lost the money and whether he had been in control of their actions.

‘The essence is whether Mr Al Geabury includes a gambling addiction plus the claimant’s knowledge of that,’ she said.

Вашият коментар

Вашият email адрес няма да бъде публикуван Задължителните полета са отбелязани с *

Можете да използвате тези HTML тагове и атрибути: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>